top of page
GettyImages-503371267_b4da5933-e718-4d91-91f6-4a20a070a19e-prv.jpg
Picture29.jpg

Prototype 1

Feedback Training for Foreign Body Removal Procedures in Emergency Department

In progress

This project was a collaboration between a team of students from Brown Engineering and Dr. Sakina Sojar from the Rhode Island Hospital 

Team:


Primary Role:


Project type:

Asad, Emily, Ariana, Ethan, Nondi
& Dr Sakina Sojar (Advisor)

Electronics, Stakeholder Analysis User Research, Prototyping

Med Tech, Engineering, UX Research

Intro

December 2022

Background and Context

Problems  being faced by Doctors in the ER

●Over 8,000 children are treated yearly for nasal foreign bodies

●Over 12,000 children are treated yearly for aural foreign bodies

●Foreign body obstruction is most commonly result of children’s curiosity

●Obstructions can range from food to toys like marbles

Emergency Department procedures:

●Parent’s kiss

●Katz extractor

●Alligator forceps

●Irrigation

●Suction

Picture6_edited.jpg

So there was a need for medical trainees to practice foreign body removal from the nose and ear on a low-cost medical simulator.

This would improve first pass success rates in removing foreign bodies from pediatric patients in the emergency department

Picture3_edited.jpg

Existing ENT FBR training devices

❏Procedural accuracy: should be able to mimic an actual pediatric FB removal procedure

❏Durability: should be long-lasting and used for many practice attempts

❏Low-cost: should be accessible for all emergency departments

❏Anatomical accuracy: should resemble human anatomy and the intricacies involved

❏Ease of use: should be uncomplicated to set up and use

Design Constraints
Screenshot 2023-01-11 at 12.31.41 PM.png
Developing the Need Statement

Preliminary Design

Initial Design Ideas

Picture9.png

Full head Model

Picture10.png

Separate Organ Model

AR/VR Training Simulation

●The criteria within the decision matrix are ranked on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest possible score.

●Each criteria are weighted differently according to their importance to the design.

Based on the analysis, Full Head Model was chosen

Design Decision Matrix
Design Ideation

A combination model with focus on the ear component.

Prototyping- CAD + Mold

Scanning

Modified for printing

● For creating the 3D printed ear model, we used Artec Spider™ 3D Scanner to scan a child's ear.

● The 3D printed ear was then used to create a negative mold.

● Then that mold was used to create a silicone casting of the Ear.

Mold-making with 3D-printed part

Casting with 30A silicone

Creating Feedback Mechanism

Haptic response for the Doctor to sense if they are hurting the sensitive parts of Ear or Nose

Testing electrical components

Ear Cavity
Picture23.png

Arduino Code

Nose Cavity

Prototype 1 Ear Model

Next steps and future goals

●Complete a high fidelity ear model with sensors that trigger at the force specified in the design requirements

●Verify the accuracy of the ear model with Dr. Sojar or other ENT specialists 

●Create a full head model that mimics the weight and size of a human to increase the anatomical and procedural accuracy of the model

●Incorporate a nose and mouth connection within the full head model for nasal foreign body removal

Survey stakeholders for possible design improvements

Final project Overview Presentation

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
bottom of page